Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Davis v. Caddo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-30108
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dennis Ray Davis, Jr., on behalf of G A P Investments S.L.L.C., Individually and, doing business as Davis Products & Services L.L.C., doing business as Affordable Construction & Trackhoe Service L.L.C., doing business as Affordable Fence Company, doi
Defendant / Appellee: Caddo Department of Public Works, James R. Martin Building & Demolition, Woodrow Wilson, Jr., Individually and in his official capacity and others
Davis v. Caddo Department of Public Works et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv01567
Plaintiff: **Sanctioned/Barred* Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Defendant: Caddo Department of Public Works and James R Martin Building & Demolition
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Peterson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00256
Plaintiff: Daryl Fitzgerald Johnson
Defendant: Troy Peterson, Harrison County, Billy Hewes and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dawes v. Dupuy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00142
Defendant: Ulyses Addison, Jr., Kyle Alford, All Current City Council Members and others
Plaintiff: Alan Dawes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Holden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00753
Plaintiff: Derrick Jerome Allen
Defendant: Richard Anderson, City of Baton Rouge, Steven Danielson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2007cv02222
Plaintiff: Ronald R Russell
Defendant: David Stevenson and City of Natchitoches Public Works Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?