Cases 1 - 10 of 555
Rogers v. Collier
as 6:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Rogers
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Duggan et al
as 1:2024cv01014
Defendant:
Flavia Pitman, Kaye Brazil, Jalyn Mathis and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Wallace Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Ikpo et al
as 4:2024cv02842
Defendant:
Lonnie Chambers, Board of Pardons & Parole and Ifreke Ikpo
Plaintiff:
Victor Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canales v. Rayford et al
as 5:2024cv00655
Defendant:
Correctional Officer S. Woleslage, Investigator Lorraine Salas, Director Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Canales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivens-Baker v. Riley
as 24-50181
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Jessica Riley, Roger Boyd, Miriam Herrera, Captain and others
Rogers v. Unknown Officers
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Unknown Officers, FNU Sowell, FNU Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 4:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 6:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Christopher Uledau, Bryan Rietsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Harris County et al
as 4:2023cv04826
Plaintiff:
Roger Walls
Defendant:
Harris County and Officer J. Carrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
