Cases 1 - 10 of 2,728
Dingle v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Marthur L Dingle
Defendant:
Phillip C Smith, Jr, Raquel West and Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Randall Co Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Duncan
Defendant:
Randall Co Detention Center, Randall Co Detention Center Staff, Sgt Bently's Shift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unknown Defendant 7:24-cv-90-O
as 7:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant 7:24-cv-90-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Martinez
as 24-50470
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Reese
Defendant:
Annette Martinez, Warden, Jodi Sawyer, T. Matz and others
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jay Harrison and Gregory Harrison
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Tammy Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ofilia Trevino et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jerel Smith
Defendant:
District Clerk Ofilia Trevino and Ofilia Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warren et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Daryl L. Davis
Defendant:
Don Warren, Shirley McKellar, Deborah Pullum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Anekwe
as 5:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Senior Chaplin Paul Anekwe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. City of McComb City Police Department
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Markez Delmont Smith
Defendant:
City of McComb City Police Department
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Price
as 1:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Jerel Smith
Defendant:
Velva L. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
