Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Vallego v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Santiago Vallego
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Sgt. Waller and D.O. A. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rocha v. Doctor Almeida et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jose Rocha, Jr and Santiago Hernandez, Jr.
Defendant:
Doctor Almeida, Rafael Lucio, Corp. Rodrigues and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Kuku
as 23-40213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant / Appellee:
Odunay O. Kuku, Assistant Warden LaMorris Marshall, Assistant Warden Juan J. Nunez and others
Gomez v. Nunez
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Juan J Nunez, J.D. Mireles and Rosalinda Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Nunez
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Odunay O Kuku and Lt A Abdulmalik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Kuku et al
as 6:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Odunay O Kuku, Assistant Warden LaMorris Marshall, Assistant Warden Juan J Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Warden, NFN Wonders, NFN Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Antwune Ladon Jenkins
Defendant:
Warden Bruce Armstrong, Sgt. FNU Whitaker, Sgt. FNU Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutter v. Garland et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Sutter
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael Carvajal, Warden S. Salmonson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Quinones v. Garza et al
as 2:2019cv00190
Plaintiff:
Manuel Quinones, Jr
Defendant:
Joe Frank Garza, Sean Wymore, Woody Densen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
