Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Adams v. Kaplan et al
as 6:2024cv01222
Defendant:
Police Dept of Kaplan, Joshua Hardy, Irvin Cates and others
Plaintiff:
Boyd Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanton, Sr. v. Vinson et al
as 1:2024cv00312
Defendant:
Pedro M Boykin, Kaylin R Vinson, Jeffrey R Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Adam Stanton, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeagin v. Onalaska Police Department et al
as 9:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Shane Yeagin
Defendant:
Onalaska Police Department, Simmon Prince and Jessica Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oatman v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Brian G. Oatman
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, A OR K RODRIGUEZ, B. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanton v. Ekeke
as 22-40168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Luke Adam Stanton, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Grace N. Ekeke, Stephanie A. Lute, April Clark and others
Stanton v. Ekeke et al
as 1:2019cv00379
Plaintiff:
Luke Adam Stanton, Sr
Defendant:
V McMullen, April Clark, Stephanie A Lute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton v. Woodard et al
as 1:2019cv00107
Defendant:
V McMullen, Wayne E Brewer, Lance C Knod and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Adam Stanton, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramlett v. Dorner et al
as 7:2018cv00165
Defendant:
Stanton Police Dept, Martin County Sheriff's Department and Jayce Dorner
Plaintiff:
Robert E Bramlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramlett v. Dorner et al
as 5:2018cv00211
Defendant:
Martin County Sheriffs Dept, Stanton Police Dept and Jayce Dorner
Plaintiff:
Robert E Bramlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Acosta et al
as 5:2017cv00198
Defendant:
Roberto Acosta, Rachel Chapa, Stanton Hawkes and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
