Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Davis v. Deville et al
as 1:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis
Defendant:
James Deville, Gary Coleman, Bobby Toler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Blackman et al
as 3:2016cv00752
Plaintiff:
Jesse Jackson
Defendant:
B.E. Blackman, C. Curry, Director of B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. Martin et al
as 3:2016cv00627
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ramirez
Defendant:
Unknown Martin, A. W. Gifford, A. W. Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wolfe v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2015cv02864
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Wolfe
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Keller, Becky Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curry v. EMCF Host Disciplinary et al
as 3:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Disciplinary, Unknown Dumas, Unknown Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Staffs Host et al
as 3:2013cv00811
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Staffs Host, ARP Medical Counsolor, I.L.A.P. Administration Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Curry v. EMCF Host Remedies, et al
as 13-60884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CURRY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EAST MISSISSIPPI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY HOST REMEDIES, NURSES, DOCTORS and others
Curry v. EMCF Host Remedies et al
as 4:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Remedies, Unknown Thomas, Unknown McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Curry, Jr. v. EMCF MDOC Director, et al
as 13-60853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CURRY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EAST MISSISSIPPI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, STAFF HOST OF THEM, ADMINISTRATION and others
Curry v. EMCF Host Remedies et al
as 4:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Remedies, Nurses, Doctors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
