Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Ransom v. Errington et al
as 1:2019cv00137
Defendant:
John Does, Regina Reed, Joe Errington and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Ransom
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Arnold et al
as 3:2018cv00754
Defendant:
MTC, Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
John Hale
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. MTC-EMCF et al
as 3:2017cv00815
Plaintiff:
LaBoris O. Gunn
Defendant:
MTC-EMCF, Centurion Medical, P. Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheldon Nathan v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 16-60314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELDON NATHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and JOHN & JANE DOES 1-100
Hale v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Defendant:
Bridget Smith, Roland Abangan, Stacey Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Hodge et al
as 2:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
Joshua C. Holloway
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Unknown Johnson, David Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Abangan et al
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Defendant:
Roland Abangan, John Doe, Unknown Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis Jones v. Mississippi Department of Corr, et al
as 10-60212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS K JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner and JOHN & JANE DOES
Willis Jones v. Mississippi Department of Corr, et al
as 09-60248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS K JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and JOHN & JANE DOES
Brown v. Polite et al
as 2:2008cv00193
Plaintiff:
Willie P. Brown
Defendant:
Felicia Polite, State of Mississippi and John & Jane Does
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
