Cases 41 - 50 of 1,004
Jordan v. Houston et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Jordan
Defendant:
Russell Houston and John Hunt
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
William L Floyd
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McConnell v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
CleDarreyell L. McConnell
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Officer John Doe, Robertson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Antoine Edwards
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Tim Hooper, Christopher Cador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Barton
as 23-30458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant / Appellee:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
Kimble v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00921
Plaintiff:
Raymond H Kimble, III
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Brent Thompson, J Pelican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liddell v. Hinds County Circuit Court
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
John D. Liddell
Defendant:
Hinds County Circuit Court
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Cupp
as 3:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
John McCray
Defendant:
Allan Cupp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Lereaux et al
as 2:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Weber
Defendant:
John Lereaux, Jeremy Puckett and Brett Exnicious
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. John Doe
as 3:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Dyques Antoione Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
