Cases 41 - 50 of 672
Williams v. Nettles
as 23-30347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe Nettles, Warden, Mark LaPrairie, Warden, John Doe Jack, Major and others
Jackson v. Bickham
as 23-30337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute, Daniel LaFleur, Laura Allen and others
Stewart v. John Doe
as 3:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Lamor D. Stewart
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Sutton
as 23-60256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee:
Sylvia Sutton, Misty Hughes, Case Manager, Captain Campbell and others
Mclendon v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Aaron Paul Mclendon
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Mississippi State Bar et al
as 1:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Billy C. Anderson
Defendant:
Mississippi State Bar, Joe Beard, Stewart Unknown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poupart v. Bordelon et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Paul Poupart
Defendant:
Donnie Bordelon, James LeBlanc, Stephanie Michel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peake v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Stephon Peake
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jordan v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Jordan
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Vital Core, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathial Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
