Cases 41 - 50 of 193
Magee v. Perry et al
as 3:2019cv00245
Defendant:
Nurse Unknown Collins, Gloria Perry, Nurse Unknown Waltzer and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall K. Magee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinley v. Lampley et al
as 1:2019cv00174
Defendant:
Deputy Warden K. Blount, Pamela C. Robinson, Pelisha Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Frank McKinley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustine v. Deville et al
as 1:2019cv00188
Defendant:
Cpt Tunner, Nurse Jones, James K Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00884
Defendant:
Nick McLendon, Jered K. Tomlinson and Vicky Williams
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Archie Cleveland Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustine v. Deville et al
as 2:2018cv14241
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Stroud, Nurse Jones, James K Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crabb v. Banks et al
as 3:2018cv00689
Defendant:
Warden Wendell K. Banks, Unknown, Sergeant Unknown Davis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
David S. Crabb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Management Training Corporation (M-T-C) et al
as 5:2018cv00091
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sean K. Smith, Pelicia Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. Mills
as 3:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
William K. Nolan
Defendant:
Bradley Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Bradley et al
as 5:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Haynes
Defendant:
Jodi Bradley, Gabriel Walker, Toomey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonhomme v. Burke et al
as 3:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Nija Syvallus Bonhomme
Defendant:
K. Burke, Nurse Jane, Jermaine Dockery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
