Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Murray et al v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
James Murray, Latavius Paschal and Antone Henderson
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Sammie Byrd, LaSalle Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Sanders et al
as 5:2020cv00165
Defendant:
Travis Patten, Lillie Blackmon Sanders, Walter Armstrong and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Bolds et al
as 3:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Officer U. Bolds, Warden Mark K. Williams, DHO T. Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Anderson
Interested Party:
Pro Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Marion County
as 2:2020cv00001
Defendant:
Marion County and Correctional Officer Brian Adiare
Plaintiff:
Arthur Blanton Ball
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moler v. Wells et al
as 2:2019cv00982
Defendant:
Officer Wells and Ian Connors
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Lampkin
as 3:2017cv00371
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Sandra Lampkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooks v. Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2013cv05558
Plaintiff:
Arthur D. Hooks
Defendant:
Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office, Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office and Arthur G. Laugand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2013cv04573
Plaintiff:
Kendall Jamal Summers
Defendant:
Louisiana State and Arthur Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demetrius Rankin v. Bruce Pearson, et al
as 13-60259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS S. RANKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE PEARSON, LEROY PITTS, ARTHUR TRUEX and others
Summers v. Hunter
as 2:2013cv01028
Plaintiff:
Kendall Jamal Summers
Defendant:
Arthur Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
