Cases 1 - 10 of 539
Lavergne v. Lavespere
as 24-30317
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott Lavergne
Defendant:
Randy Lavespere, Doctor/Medical Director- Louisiana State Penitentiary, Cindy Park, Nurse Practitioner- Louisiana State Penitentiary, Brady Boudin, Respiratory Specialist - Louisiana State Penitentiary and others
Ary v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Earnest T Ary
Defendant:
Nolen Bass, A Johnson, Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grace v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Kevorkian De'Hon Grace
Defendant:
Warden Lionel Johnson and Disciplinary Officer Tirah Sanders
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pike County Jail
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
DeJuan Marquis Johnson
Defendant:
Pike County Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff
as 24-30295
Plaintiff:
Damien Kentreal Johnson
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office and Joseph P. Lopinto
Huglon v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
S L Huglon
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Mel et al
as 3:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Mel, Unknown Johnson and Unknown Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Richard Burnham
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Jacob Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Russell Roberts and Andria Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Favre v. Harrison County, MS
as 24-60114
Plaintiff:
Noah Don Favre
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Troy Peterson, Sheriff, MBN Agents, ABC to be named and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
