Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Stewart v. Finkley et al
as 1:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
James D. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Finkley, MDOC Corrections, Jackson County, MS and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marler v. Wood, et al
as 1:2022cv02460
Plaintiff:
CHANTELLE MARIA MARLER
Defendant:
SHERIFF MARK WOOD, UNKNOWN MEDICAL SERVICE PROVIDER, RPSO DEPS. JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kivinen v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 6:2020cv00870
Defendant:
Does 1-10, C Denise Finlay, Vanda Davidson and others
Plaintiff:
Sami Kaleva Kivinen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton v. Edwards et al
as 2:2020cv01017
Defendant:
Mark Francois, Heath Martin, Sherry Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Milton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Guillory v. Jones County Jail, et al
as 16-60250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT P. GUILLORY
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF ALEX HODGE, MAJOR RANDY JOHNSON, CAPTAIN DAVID HARE and others
Douglas v. Emfinger et al
as 3:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Keon Reginald Douglas
Defendant:
Unknown Emfinger, Randy Harris, District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Hodge et al
as 2:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joel Graham
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Lucille Howard, David Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Rowan et al
as 5:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tarrius D. Holt
Defendant:
Unknown Rowan, Gabriel Walker, Unknown King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Hodge et al
as 2:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
Joshua C. Holloway
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Unknown Johnson, David Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. Hodge et al
as 2:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hancock
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, David Hare and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
