Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kimble v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2019cv13078
Defendant:
David Deroche, Edward Olsen, C Silbernagel and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Harold Kimble, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rousell v. Blanchard et al
as 2:2017cv01581
Plaintiff:
Braxston Lamar Rousell
Defendant:
P. Blanchard, Deputy Bonovillian, Jr., K. Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2014cv00325
Defendant:
Unknown Hooper, James M. LeBlanc, Unknown McKey and others
Interested Party:
William L Kline
Plaintiff:
Steven Langley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Lay v. Fuller, et al
as 12-30449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LAY
Defendant - Appellee:
FULLER, JERRY GOODWIN, LONNIE NAIL and others
Gonzalez v. Corr Corp of America, et al
as 08-61127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSVALDO R GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Owner of Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility, CANTEEN CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, ROBERT ADAMS, Warden, Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility and others
Guiden v. Prator, et al
as 08-30903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GUIDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
H WILSON, T HENRY, ANTHONY GAINES and others
Guiden v. Prator, et al
as 08-30901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GUIDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
H WILSON, T HENRY, ANTHONY GAINES and others
Gonzalez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2008cv00089
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo R. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Canteen Correctional Services, Robert Adams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Guiden v. Prator et al
as 5:2007cv00370
Plaintiff:
Charles Guiden
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Robert Wyche, A C Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Prator, et al
as 5:2007cv00126
Plaintiff:
Gary Dean Walker
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Dorothy Troudt, Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
