Cases 1 - 10 of 603
Parker v. Fleischman et al
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
John Edwin Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Fleischman, Randy Smith, J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Sorrell Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Randy Smith, Jose Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quiroz v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Estaban Cantu Quiroz
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Warden Flistman and Doctor Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creppel v. Cashio
as 24-30191
Plaintiff:
Jean Paul Creppel
Defendant:
J. R. Cashio, Captain, A-EMT #521, P. Smith, Sergeant, NREM-P #586 and Cynthia Park, Nurse Practitioner
Nelson v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lavar Nelson
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Austin Calvert, Sidney Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calloway v. Pinkney
as 24-30178
Plaintiff:
Michael Calloway
Defendant:
Cedric Pinkney, Sergeant, Tyler Butler, Lieutenant and William Smith, Major
Smith v. Soignet et al
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Smith
Defendant:
Timothy Soignet, Rhonda Ledet and April Tomlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 24-30049
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
White v. McComb Police Department
as 5:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Nijoul White
Defendant:
McComb Police Department and Delre Smith
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 23-30922
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
