Cases 161 - 170 of 1,074
Nickel v. Post Acute Medical, LLC
as 6:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jennifer M. Nickel
Defendant:
Post Acute Medical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Ramirez v. M and N Plastics, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Morayma Ramirez
Defendant:
M and N Plastics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
O'Neal v. Universal Protection Service, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Larry O'Neal
Defendant:
Universal Protection Service, LLC and Gary Marino
Cervera v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Antonio
as 5:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
David Cervera
Defendant:
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Antonio, Texas and Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Reese v. McWane, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Marcus Reese
Defendant:
McWane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
King v. International Paper Company
as 2:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
El-Ray King
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Lucio v. Aero Products and Services JV, LLC
as 4:2022cv01676
Plaintiff:
Miguel Lucio
Defendant:
Aero Products and Services JV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Bowen v. Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC
as 1:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Gayla Bowen
Defendant:
Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Coffin v. Tomball Independent School District
as 4:2022cv01516
Plaintiff:
Sharena Coffin
Defendant:
Tomball Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Woods v. Gay Toys, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Oscar Woods
Defendant:
Gay Toys, Inc. doing business as American Plastic Toys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
