Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Coleman v. Brozen
as 23-10832
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jason Coleman, on behalf of the RVNB Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and on behalf of a class of all other persons similarly situated and Jessica Casey, on behalf of the RVNB Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and on behalf of aa class of all other persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
Neil M. Brozen, Robert Peterson, Jr., Vasilia Peterson and others
Coleman et al v. Brozen et al
as 3:2020cv01358
Petitioner:
Jason Coleman and Jessica Casey
Respondent:
Neil M. Brozen, Vasilia Peterson, Robert Peterson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Coleman et al v. Brozen et al
as 4:2019cv00705
Plaintiff:
Jessica Casey and Jason Coleman
Defendant:
Sterling Investment Partners III, L.P., Robert Peterson, Jr., Nick Bouras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Coleman v. Temple-Inland, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Coleman
Defendant:
Temple-Inland, Inc. and State Street Retiree Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Coleman v. Canada Life Assurance Company et al
as 3:2011cv00495
Plaintiff:
Tommie J. Coleman
Defendant:
Canada Life Assurance Company and Brammer Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Kellar v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2010cv01827
Plaintiff:
Coleman W. Kellar
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Coleman v. Sedgwick CMS Insurance Company, Administrator of the Unitedhealth Group Incorporated Long Term Disability Plan
as 4:2010cv00448
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Coleman
Defendant:
Sedgwick CMS Insurance Company, Administrator of the Unitedhealth Group Incorporated Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
AVC-PALTEX CORPORATION v. Coleman
as 4:2008cv02187
Plaintiff:
AVC-PALTEX CORPORATION
Defendant:
Stanley Coleman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
