Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Amy's Ice Creams, Inc. v. Amy's Kitchen, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
Amy's Ice Creams, Inc.
Defendant:
Amy's Kitchen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Coach, Inc. et al v. 2Q Salon et al
as 4:2012cv00849
Defendant:
2Q Salon, Debbie Quintanilla, Amy Renee Ribeiro and others
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc and Coach Services, Inc
Cross_claimant:
Shiloh Hanke, 2Q Salon and Debbie Quintanilla
Cross_defendant:
Amy Renee Ribeiro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Cafe des Amis, Inc. v. Bacchus Management Group, LLC
as 6:2010cv01756
Plaintiff:
Cafe des Amis, Inc.
Defendant:
Bacchus Management Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Mary Kay, Inc. v. Amy Weber, et al
as 09-11117
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
MARY KAY, INC.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
AMY L. WEBER, SCOTT J. WEBER and TOUCH OF PINK COSMETICS
Mary Kay Inc v. Weber et al
as 3:2008cv00776
Plaintiff:
Mary Kay Inc, Mary Kay Inc, Mary Kay Inc and others
Defendant:
Amy L Weber, Scott J Weber and Touch of Pink Cosmetics
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Urgent Care v. South Mississippi, et al
as 08-60155
Counter Claimant - Appellant:
AMY ALI, RONNIE ALI and SOUTH MISSISSIPPI URGENT CARE, INC
Counter Defendant - Appellee:
LYDIA KING RAYNER, URGENT CARE INC and URGICARE INC
Farouk Systems, Inc. v. Larz Inc et al
as 4:2007cv03383
Plaintiff:
Farouk Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Larz Inc, Mark Larson, Amy Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Urgent Care, Inc. et al v. South Mississippi Urgent Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00138
Plaintiff:
Urgent Care, Inc. and Uricare, Inc.
Defendant:
South Mississippi Urgent Care, Inc., Ronnie Ali, Amy Ali and others
Counter Claimant:
South Mississippi Urgent Care, Inc., Amy Ali, Ronnie Ali and others
Counter Defendant:
Urgent Care, Inc., Uricare, Inc., Lydia King Rayner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
