Cases 1 - 6 of 6
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor:
State of New Jersey
Arnesen et al v. Raimondo et al
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
George D. Arnesen and Jeffrey Ryan Bradley
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo, National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc. and William Copeland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00068
Defendant:
United States of America , Kirstjen M. Nielsen , Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
State of Texas , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Karla Perez , Maria Rocha , Jose Magana-Salgado and others
Movant:
State of New Jersey
Amicu:
U.S. Rep. Steve King, et al.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Menendez v. McAleenan et al
as 4:2019cv02428
Defendant:
ACTING SECRETARY Kevin McAleenan, Wallace L. Carroll and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli
Plaintiff:
Emma Diaz Menendez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DIAZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2017cv00795
Plaintiff:
EDWIN DIAZ
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office, US Department of Veterans Affairs, United State of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DIAZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2017cv00556
Plaintiff:
EDWIN DIAZ
Defendant:
United States of America , US Department of Veterans Affairs , United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
