Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Wages & White Lion Investments LLC v. Califf et al
as 3:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Wages & White Lion Investments, LLC doing business as Triton Distribution and Wages & White Lion Investments LLC doing business as Triton Distribution
Defendant:
Robert M. Califf, M.D., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
State of Louisiana v. Biden
as 22-30087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, by and through its Attorney General, Jeff Landry, State of Alabama, by and through its Attorney General, Steve Marchall, State of Florida, by and through its Attorney General, Ashley Moody and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, Cecilia Rouse, in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Shalanda Young, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Richardson v. Saul et al
as 4:2020cv00033
Defendant:
Jason White, Mr. Jones, Tamarra Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Coreen J. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
White Oak Realty, L.L.C., et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 17-30438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WHITE OAK REALTY, L.L.C. and CITRUS REALTY, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, Lieutenant General, United States Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity, JOHN W. PEABODY, Major General, Commander, Mississippi Valley Division, United States Army Corps of Engineers, in his official capacity and others
White Oak Realty, LLC et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2013cv04761
Plaintiff:
White Oak Realty, LLC and Citrus Realty, LLC
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P Bostick, John W Peabody and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
