Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Roor International BV et al v. King Tobacco Inc et al
as 4:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Amirali Panjwani and King Tobacco Inc
Plaintiff:
Sream Inc and Roor International BV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
King Ranch Inc et al v. King Ranch Pools LLC et al
as 3:2018cv03370
Defendant:
King Ranch Pools LLC, Enrique V Huerta, Enrique B Huerta and others
Plaintiff:
King Ranch Turfgrass LP, King Ranch Inc, King Ranch IP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
American Patents LLC v. TCL Corp. et al
as 4:2018cv00767
Defendant:
TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd., TCL Corp., TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
American Patents LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RooR International BV et al v. Smoke Kings et al
as 4:2018cv03698
Plaintiff:
Sream, Inc. and RooR International BV
Defendant:
John Doe and Smoke Kings
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Krajnyak v. Lionsgate Petroleum, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00205
Defendant:
Gregory R. King Oil & Gas LLC, Gregory Randolph King and Lionsgate Petroleum, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kyle Krajnyak
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Voit Technologies, LLC v. Golf Cart King, LLC
as 1:2017cv01181
Defendant:
Golf Cart King, LLC
Plaintiff:
Voit Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Map Mobile, LLC v. Burger King Corporation
as 2:2017cv00774
Plaintiff:
Map Mobile, LLC
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
M2 Technology, Incorporated v. M2 Software, Incorporated, et al
as 17-40476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M2 TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
KING LAW GROUP, P.L.L.C., RICHARD KING and MARY ELLEN KING
Location Services IP, LLC v. Burger King Corporation
as 2:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
Location Services IP, LLC
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Oberalis LLC v. One Kings Lane Inc.
as 2:2015cv00980
Plaintiff:
Oberalis LLC
Defendant:
One Kings Lane Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
