Social Security Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 92
Mata v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2019cv01120
Plaintiff: Daniel R. Mata, Jr.
Defendant: Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gomez v. Saul
as 4:2019cv03291
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Daniel Ruben Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniels v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2019cv00155
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Diane Lynn Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Patterson v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00532
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Brittany Danielle Patterson
Interested Party: SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dickson v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00142
Plaintiff: Daniel Dickson
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bryant v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv00289
Plaintiff: Aaron Daniel Bryant
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Boyle v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00103
Plaintiff: Danielle R Boyle
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Tyler v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00187
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Daniel L. Tyler
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Daniels v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00159
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Carla E. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Kiefer v. Berryhill
as 7:2018cv00122
Plaintiff: Daniel R. Kiefer
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?