Cases 51 - 60 of 91
Earl Mackey, III v. Michael Astrue, et al
as 11-10983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL H. MACKEY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and TEXAS REHABILITATION COMMISSION
Stein v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Cheryl H. Stein
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Berryman v. Astrue
as 6:2011cv00304
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H Berryman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Julie H Sulik v. Cazayoux et al
as 3:2011cv00339
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Julie H Sulik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jarrell v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv00258
Defendant:
Michael Astrue and United States Atty Donald J Cazayoux, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Holly H. Jarrell
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael McGennis v. SSA
as 11-40044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL H. MCGENNIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Mackey v. Astrue et al
as 6:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
Earl H Mackey, III
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue , Texas Rehabilitation Commission and Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Gill v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00615
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kevin H Gill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Foster v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Willie H. Foster, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2010cv01046
Plaintiff:
Tina H Jones
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.