Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Helms et al
as 3:2014mc00032
Defendant:
Arcady Resources, LLC, Barefoot Minerals, G.P., William L. Barlow and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Helms et al
as 2:2014mc01337
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert A. Helms, Janniece S. Kaelin, Deven Sellers and others
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Helms et al
as 4:2014mc00015
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert A Helms, Janniece S Kaelin, Deven Sellers and others
Receiver:
Thomas L Taylor, III
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Helms et al
as 5:2014mc00014
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert A Helms , Janniece S Kaelin , Deven Sellers and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Helms et al
as 2:2014mc00080
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert A. Helms, S. Janniece Kaelin, Deven Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Helms et al
as 1:2013cv01036
Defendant:
Arcady Resources LLC, Barefoot Minerals, G.P., William L. Barlow and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Helms v. Montgomery Lynch & Associates, Inc., et al.
as 2:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Darwin Helms
Defendant:
Montgomery Lynch & Associates, Inc. and Ken Scott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Helm v. Wells Fargo et al
as 2:2011mc02027
Plaintiff:
Ian Kurtis Helm
Defendant:
Wells Fargo and John G. Stumpf
USA v. Christopher Helm
as 10-40133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HELM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
