Cases 71 - 80 of 159
Walter C. Ruman v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 5:2017cv00733
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Mortgage Contracting Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Walter C. Ruman
Cause Of Action: 50 U.S.C. § 3937 Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) - Interest Rate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LaBauve et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2017cv00259
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Randall LaBauve and Stephanie LaBauve
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Westervelt v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2017cv00251
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
William G Westervelt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 17-40384
Petitioner:
In re: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. FISHER, Individually, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel, KEITH FRANKLIN and others
Luby's Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC v. Visa Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01049
Plaintiff:
Luby's Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC
Defendant:
Visa Inc, MasterCard Incorporated, Barclays Bank of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Ron Henry, et al.
as 4:2016cv02770
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Ron Henry , Clayton Guillory , Anita Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
