Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Centennial Bank v. Holmes, et al
as 5:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
Jerry "Bud" Holmes, Jay House, Channing Baisley and others
Hernandez-Chan v. Garland
as 22-60275
Petitioner:
Maura Hernandez-Chan
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Missouri et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Jennifer Rene Psaki, Vivek H. Murthy and others
Petitioner:
Judson Witham, Kimberly D Hogan, Mike Webb and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Samaruddin K Stewart, Henry Schwartz and Global Engagement Center
Amicus Curiae:
Alliance Defending Freedom, Buckeye Institute and Childrens Health Defense
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Connie Sampognaro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Johnson v. Hill
as 21-20198
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer NFN Kelly, Detention Staff Member and Officer Channing Hill
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Antonio Andrea Johnson
Taylor v. Poffinbarger
as 21-20097
Defendant / Appellee:
Sandra Poffinbarger, Arnel Chan, Calvin Simmons and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifton Lamar Taylor
Vannary Chan v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61000
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Vannary Chan
Vannary Chan v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60130
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
VANNARY CHAN
Shore Chan DePumpo LLP v. Yageo Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00422
Plaintiff:
Shore Chan DePumpo LLP
Defendant:
Yageo Corporation and Chilisin Electronics Corp
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
USA v. Eric Chan
as 18-50712
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC CHAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
