Cases 1 - 6 of 6
State of LA v. Centers for Disease
as 22-30303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Innovation Law Lab
State of Texas v. Walensky et al
as 6:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
Dr. Rochelle Walensky, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v.Centers for Disease Control & Prevention et al
as 6:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, U S Dept of Health & Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey C Arrington, Brian Babin, Jim Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv03867
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Indiana and State of Mississippi
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, The United States of America, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Texas v. Biden et al
as 4:2021cv00579
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Chambless Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Rochelle Walensky
as 21-30037
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Nina Witkofsky and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Apartment Association of Louisiana, Incorporated and Chambless Enterprises, L.L.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
