Cases 161 - 170 of 1,048
Arthur Morales v. Scott Kernan
as 19-16532
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary-CDCR
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR MORALES
Turner v. Newsom et al
as 1:2019cv00338
Respondent:
William Joe Sullivan, Scott Kernan, Siannah Collado and others
Petitioner:
Steven Deon Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mychal Reed v. P. Vera, et al
as 19-16449
Defendant / Appellee:
D. MADSEN, Lieutenant
Defendant:
A. LIMON, Correctional Officer, P. VERA and SCOTT KERNAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYCHAL ANDRA REED
(PC) Hammler v. The State of California et al
as 1:2019cv00785
Defendant:
Cervantes, Scott Kernan, Baraona and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rickey Alford v. USDC-SAC
as 19-71911
Not Yet Classified:
RICKY TAYLOR, Parole Agent and SCOTT KERNAN
Petitioner:
RICKEY LOUIS ALFORD
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RICKEY LOUIS ALFORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
(PC) Hammler v. Cota et al
as 1:2019cv00783
Defendant:
I. Salcedo, J. Hubbard, M. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Church et al v. Kernan et al
as 1:2019cv00915
Defendant:
Richard Tait, Robert Brewster, Luke Bostick and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Church, Jr. and Judy Ronningen Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Hill v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-16365
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Y. AYALA, M. VOONG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH HILL
Jason Sanchez v. Scott Kernan
as 19-55815
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Respondent
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON SANCHEZ
(PC) Johnson v. Lozano et al
as 2:2019cv01128
Defendant:
Larry Lesane, Perez, Scott Kernan and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine L Johnson and Antoine L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
