Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Collier v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Maegan Marlene Collier and Malee M. Sumrall
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC , AT&T, Inc. , ARI Fleet, LT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thibodeaux v. A T & T Mobility Services L L C et al
as 6:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kelly Marie Thibodeaux
Defendant:
A T & T Mobility Services L L C , A T & T Corp and A T & T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thibodeaux v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kelly Marie Thibodeaux
Defendant:
A T & T Mobility Services L L C , A T & T Corp and A T & T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Senthilnathan v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2015cv01144
Plaintiff:
Rajamani Senthilnathan
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans et al v. AT & T, Corp. et al
as 5:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
John C. Evans and Debra G. Evans
Defendant:
AT & T, Corp. , AT & T, Inc., Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Kroger Texas L P et al
as 4:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
Demetria Sanders
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L P and M.C. of T. Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Archie Williams v. AT&T, et al
as 09-20231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE L WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, formerly SBC Communications Inc, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE LP, now known as Southwestern Bell Telephone Company of Texas, EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., in His Official Capacity as Chairman and CEO of AT&T Inc and others
Tillery v. Beavers et al
as 2:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Tillery
Defendant:
Max E. Beavers, Max E. Beavers, B-T, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Williams v. AT&T Inc et al
as 4:2007cv00559
Plaintiff:
Archie L Williams
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, AT&T Inc, AT&T Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2616 Medical Recovery Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
