Cases 11 - 20 of 45
King v. Robertson et al
as 3:2021cv01653
Defendant:
A B C Insurance Co, Mary Kate Robertson, Willie Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dean King, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isom v. Texas State Guard et al
as 3:2021cv01351
Defendant:
Texas State Defense Focre Commander, Texas State Guard, Major General Manuel A Rodriquez VII and others
Plaintiff:
Tyesha D Isom and Tyesha N Isom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watsky v. Williamson County et al
as 1:2021cv00374
Defendant:
Lieutenant Mark Luera, Sheriff Robert Chody, Williamson County and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Watsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. City of Madison, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00702
Defendant:
Officer Randy Tyler, Investigator Charles Harrison, III, SRT Commander Captain Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant, II v. Baker et al
as 7:2020cv00232
Defendant:
James A. Baker, Commander In Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces and State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant, II v. Baker et al
as 5:2020cv00131
Petitioner:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Commander In Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, James A Baker, III and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant, II v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Commander-In-Chief, James A Baker and State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant, II v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
President of the United States, James A Baker, State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00806
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpless v. Ark Hope Commander
as 3:2019cv00689
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
Ark Hope Commander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
