Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Incorrectly filed. Open MC 4:22mc00612
as 4:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Judge Orlando Rodriguez, Ex-Judge Romero Molina, Craig Stephen Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ogle v. Hays County, Texas et al
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Scott Ogle
Defendant:
Hays County, Texas, E. Rosales, O. Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Guled v. Team Car Care, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv03214
Plaintiff:
Fatimo A Guled
Defendant:
Team Car Care, LLC doing business as Jiffy Lube, Jeff Balagna, Steve Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chapa et al v. City of Pasadena et al
as 4:2021cv03444
Plaintiff:
Margarita Chapa, Balthazar Cantu, Irene Chapa and others
Defendant:
City of Pasadena, Jesse Baum, Davis Brashier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ettinoffe et al v. Sheikh et al
as 4:2021cv02646
Plaintiff:
Marie Ettinoffe, Samuel Ettinoffe and Curvin Ettinoffe
Defendant:
OFFICER M Sheikh, OFFICER R Guzman, OFFICER E Tobias and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coway et al v. Romero et al
as 6:2021cv02125
Plaintiff:
katja coway and Morgan marks
Defendant:
Thomas Romero, Anthony Green, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
