Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Armstrong v. Reed et al
as 4:2018cv00727
Plaintiff:
Tristan Omarr Armstrong
Defendant:
Susan D. Reed, The Bexar County District Attorney's Office, Sid L Harle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Bexar County, Texas et al
as 4:2017cv03194
Plaintiff:
Tristan Omarr Armstrong
Defendant:
Bexar County, Texas, Universal City and Universal City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2017cv00613
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Darrell Vannoy and Tristan Wright
Plaintiff:
Kuantay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. LaHood et al
as 4:2017cv00814
Plaintiff:
Tristan Omarr Armstrong
Defendant:
Nicolas LaHood, Ken Taylor, Gary Speer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Bexar County, et al
as 5:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
Tristan Omarr Armstrong
Defendant:
Bexar County Texas and Universal City Police Department
210) 271-0602 (fax:
Universal City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Conway v. Pommier et al
as 6:2015cv02605
Plaintiff:
Kerry J Conway
Defendant:
Mitch Pommier, Jeff Vincent, Tristan Bouillion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
D'Aquin v. McElraevey et al
as 2:2015cv01755
Plaintiff:
Thomas L D'Aquin
Defendant:
Denise McElraevey , Aarons , Aaron's District Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
