Cases 31 - 40 of 112
Johnson v. Gusman, et al
as 2:2018cv05068
Plaintiff:
Dionne Johnson
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman, Gary Maynard, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greta Cazenave v. Charles Foti, Jr., et al
as 18-30424
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES C. FOTI, JR., in his individual capacity, BARBARA ACOMB, Wardens, WILLIAM SHORT and others
Movant - Appellant:
RAHSAAN BRANDON DARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford et al v. Gusman et al
as 2:2017cv13397
Plaintiff:
Cellette Crawford
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman, Deputy Savage, Angela Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burl v. Embrace Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv12092
Plaintiff:
Linia M. Burl
Defendant:
Embrace Home Loans, Inc., Round Point Mortgage Servicing Corporation, Lakeview Loans Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thomas v. Gusman et al
as 2:2017cv10639
Plaintiff:
Tresscel Thomas
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman, Gary Maynard, Keriana Alexcee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Gusman et al
as 2:2017cv08703
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman , Chaz Ruiz, Keriana Alexcee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copelin et al v. Gusman et al
as 3:2017cv00602
Defendant:
Corey Amacker, Angela Griffin, Marlin Gusman and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Copelin, Phillip Dominick, III and Donald Guidry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crittindon et al v. Gusman et al
as 3:2017cv00512
Defendant:
Corey Amacker, Angela Griffin, Marlin Gusman and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Burse and Jessie Crittindon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
