Cases 31 - 40 of 1,002
Smith v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Smith
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Yoon v. Garg
as 23-20519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jung-Hoon Yoon
Defendant / Appellee:
Nisha Garg, Carolee King, Daniel Sharphorn and others
Smith v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Smith
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Berrocal et al v. San Antonio Police Department Headquarters et al
as 5:2023cv01319
Plaintiff:
Henry B. Berrocal, Humanity for Wisdom Community Center Health and Human Services, Elegant and Happy LLC and others
Defendant:
San Antonio Police Department Headquarters, Chief of Police William McManus, Leon Valley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act - Public Accommodations
Martin v. The United States et al
as 3:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
Timothy P Martin
Defendant:
The United States, The State of Texas and Randall B Isenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MENDOZA v. MVM, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
MARIO MENDOZA, JR.
Defendant:
MVM, Inc. and KG&P STRATEGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
