Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Mocsary v. Ard et al
as 3:2017cv01713
Defendant:
Jason Ard, Eric Lockhart, Jacob McKnight and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mocsary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brady et al v. City of Greenville, Mississippi et al
as 4:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Angela Brady and James Brady
Defendant:
City of Greenville, Mississippi , City of Greenville Police Department , Angie Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Rushing et al
as 3:2017cv00716
Plaintiff:
Wanda Adams
Defendant:
Charlene Rushing , Sammy Moon , Steven Gorwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Samuel et al v. Frazier
as 6:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Zachary Bias, Andre Frank C., R. Contreras and others
Defendant:
Riyon Derrell Frazier, Sui Juris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Discrimination
Chipley v. Yazoo County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00901
Plaintiff:
Marie Rhodes Chipley
Defendant:
Yazoo County, Mississippi, Jacob Sheriff, Simon Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landry v. Chabert Operational Management Company, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2016cv03900
Plaintiff:
Saul Francis Landry, III
Defendant:
Chabert Operational Management Company, L.L.C., Joseph Waitz, Jr., Houma Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Lafleur v. Leglue et al
as 3:2016cv00254
Defendant:
Jason Ard, Karleen Leglue, Livingston Parish Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Londi L Lafleur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
