Cases 41 - 50 of 129
Zabihi et al v. The Post Oak Hotel et al
as 4:2019cv04054
Defendant:
Monument Protective Services, LLC, The Post Oak Hotel, Joshua Barry and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zabihi and Devin Zabihi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02707
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Hale v. Denton County, et al
as 4:2019cv00337
Defendant:
Tracy Murphree, Does 1 - 50 and Denton County
Plaintiff:
Susan Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughan v. Lewisville Independent School District et al
as 4:2019cv00109
Defendant:
Kronda Thimesch, Kristi Hassett, Allison Lassahn and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Springer-Tatsch et al v. Alpine Manor LP et al
as 7:2019cv00034
Defendant:
Gianna Valdez and Alpine Manor LP
Plaintiff:
Kelli Springer-Tatsch and Tracy Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Christopher et al v. Lawson et al
as 4:2018cv03943
Plaintiff:
Tex Christopher, Tracy Shannon, Pastor Calvin Miller and others
Defendant:
Sylvester Turner and Rhea Lawson
Amicus Curiae:
National Alliance of Black Pastors, Coalition of Doctors Defending Reparative Therapy and Center for Garden State Families
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy et al v. Snell et al
as 1:2018cv00162
Defendant:
Richard Perez, Katie Snell, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Kennedy and Richard Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
