Cases 51 - 60 of 131
Connell v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00814
Defendant:
Dalton McCullen, John Doe #1, William Sollie and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Connell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Espinoza v. Webb County et al
as 5:2019cv00128
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Texas Webb County, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Isreal Espinoza and Israel Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Webre et al
as 3:2019cv00552
Plaintiff:
Ramon Torres
Defendant:
Bobby Webre, Warden Paul Hall, John Doe 7 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garza v. Harris County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2019cv01263
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, Harris County Sheriff's Department, Harris County Constable Department Pct. 6, Pct. 7, Pct. 8 and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W.P. v. Gusman et al
as 2:2019cv02383
Defendant:
Deputy Johnson 2, Deputy Johnson, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
W.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bond v. Nueces County, Texas
as 2:2019cv00043
Plaintiff:
Diana Bond
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. Hancock County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00354
Defendant:
Hancock County, Mississippi, Milton Aric Latschar, John Doe # 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Martinez and Marcos Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy et al v. Snell et al
as 1:2018cv00162
Defendant:
Richard Perez, Katie Snell, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Kennedy and Richard Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Jenkins v. Sebring et al
as 1:2018cv00311
Defendant:
Shaun Sebring, City of Gulfport, Mississippi, Brantley Cumberland and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
