Cases 61 - 68 of 68
Cheryl Dupre v. Healthcare Integrity, et al
as 09-30481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL A DUPRE
Defendant - Appellee:
HEALTHCARE INTEGRITY AND PROTECTION DATA BANK, NATIONAL PRACTITIONER DATA BANK and JOHN M. HEYOB, Director, Division of Quality Assurance, Department of Health and Human Services of the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services
Gregory Harlan, et al v. Dept of Health and Human Svc, et al
as 09-20207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY HARLAN and MARVINELL HARLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH ROUSE, Individual Capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KENDRICK SMALL, Attorney, Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harlan et al v. Department Of Health And Human Services et al
as 4:2008cv01943
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harlan and Marvinell Harlan
Defendant:
Department Of Health And Human Services, Ralph Rouse, Kenneth Small and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vance v. Texas Department of Health and Human Services
as 3:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Vance
Defendant:
Texas Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stewart v. Perry et al
as 1:2007cv01270
Plaintiff:
Tanya Denise Stewart
Defendant:
Johnnie Mae Perry, Jackson County, Mississippi, Singing River Hospital Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perot, et al v. HHS, et al
as 07-20128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PEROT, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and SELECTCARE OF TEXAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
