Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaquemines Parish Ventures LLC v. Plaquemines Parish Council et al
as 2:2023cv07337
Plaintiff:
Plaquemines Parish Ventures LLC
Defendant:
Plaquemines Parish Council and Carlton LaFrance, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway v. Revelstoke Venture, LLC.
as 4:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Elisha Holloway and Elisha N Holloway
Defendant:
Revelstoke Venture, LLC. and Revelstoke Venture LLC
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Post Hole Ventures, LLC et al v. City of Kerrville, TX
as 5:2021cv00980
Plaintiff:
Post Hole Ventures, LLC and Lee Brent Bates
Defendant:
City of Kerrville, TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
