Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hill, Sr. v. City of Monahans et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Aaron Tremell Hill, Sr. and Aaron Tremell Hill, Sr
Defendant:
City of Monahans, Rex Thee, Luis Esquivel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. Garcia et al
as 2:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
John J. Palmer
Defendant:
Abel Garcia, Jr., John Doe, Bane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Esquivel v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Robert James Esquivel
Defendant:
The State of Texas, City of San Antonio, San Antonio Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Esquivel v. Kendrick
as 22-50979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert J. Esquivel and Robert James Esquivel
Defendant / Appellee:
David Kendrick, Badge #0567, Patrol Division, San Antonio Police Department, Logan Eastburn, DPS, Trooper #14720, Ryan Bibby, DPS, Trooper #14593 and others
Esquivel v. Paul Young Chevrolet, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00189
Plaintiff:
Nalleli Esquivel
Defendant:
Paul Young Chevrolet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00690
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gallegos v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
NORA ISABEL LAM GALLEGOS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Janet Napolitano, DAVID V AGUILAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
