Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hernandez v. El Pasoans Fighting
as 22-50240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alejandro Hernandez
Defendant / Appellee:
El Pasoans Fighting Hunger, Jose "Abe" Gonzalez and Susan E. Goodall
Goodale v. Seguin et al
as 5:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Samantha Nichole Houston Goodale
Defendant:
Mark Seguin, Nathan Bundy and The City of San Antonio, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. El Pasoans Fighting Hunger et al
as 3:2021cv00055
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Hernandez
Defendant:
Jose "Abe" Gonzalez, Susan E. Goodall and El Pasoans Fighting Hunger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mark Thompson v. William Johns, et al
as 17-50704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM JOHNS, CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAYOR CITY OF AUSTIN and others
David Ponder v. Avalon Corrtl Services, Inc., et al
as 17-50695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. PONDER
Defendant - Appellee:
AVALON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, DONALD E. SMITH, GREG BASHAM and others
Mark Thompson v. William Johns, et al
as 1:2016cv01132
Defendant:
City of Austin Police Department, Jannette Goodall, William Johns and others
Petitioner:
Mark Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Johns et al
as 1:2016cv00865
Defendant:
Mayor City of Austin, Jannette Goodall and William Johns
Plaintiff:
Mark Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ponder v. Avalon Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00336
Defendant:
Avalon Correctional Services, Inc., Greg Basham, Loy Cerrano and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Ponder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodale et al v. Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv00254
Plaintiff:
Lisa Goodale, Lisa Goodale, Loretta Ramos and others
Defendant:
Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. and Texas Laurel Ridge Hospital LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
