Cases 1 - 10 of 644
Dier v. Landry et al
as 2:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dier
Defendant:
Conrad Appel, Sandy Holloway, Ronnie Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solomon v. Page et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Defendant:
Belcalis Marlenis Almanzar, Kevin Lee, Quavious Keyate Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Solomon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ross v. Zeringue et al
as 2:2024cv02085
Defendant:
Kevin Clement, Thibodaux City and Bryan P Zeringue
Plaintiff:
Ricky L Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ordonye v. Clement et al
as 2:2024cv02084
Defendant:
Kevin Clement and Thibodaux City
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ordonye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kohute v. Carrollton Springs
as 4:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kohute
Defendant:
Carrollton Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kohute v. Carrollton Springs
as 6:2024cv00304
Defendant:
Carrollton Springs
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kohute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez-Merino v. Grayson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2024cv00748
Defendant:
Grayson County Sheriff's Office, District Attorney Brett Smith, Lieutenant Chad Brinlee and others
Plaintiff:
Arlene Perez-Merino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
