Cases 1 - 10 of 11
King v. Academy of America et al
as 3:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Diamond King
Defendant:
Academy of America, Academy of Dallas, Lecester l Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpless v. County Employee et al
as 3:2016cv00461
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
County Employee, County Clerk and George L Allen Sr Court Building
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monica Hawkins v. 301st District Court
as 14-10610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONICA REGINA HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE L. ALLEN, SR., Court 301st
Hawkins v. George L Allen Sr Court 301st
as 3:2014cv01067
Plaintiff:
Monica Regina Hawkins
Defendant:
George L Allen Sr Court 301st
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Allen v. Michael Seiler, et al
as 13-10243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL L. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE MICHAEL T. SEILER, Official Capacity, GREG ABBOTT, Attorney General of Texas, Official Capacity, ALLISON TAYLOR, Executive Director, Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Allen v. Seiler et al
as 4:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L Allen
Defendant:
Michael T Seiler, Greg Abbott, Allison Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
