Cases 1 - 10 of 119
White v. Mills et al
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
John D. White
Defendant:
Dee Ann Mills and Danielle Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, Perry County, Mississippi, Mitch Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kendricks v. USA Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Sheila Denise Kendricks
Defendant:
USA Department of Justice, State of Texas A.G.'s Office, Methodist Children's Home and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, John Doe Officers 1-10 and John Doe Entities 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. Prator et al
as 5:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Terry Tucker
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Kelli Hayes, Debra Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mills v. City of Winona et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Murray Mills
Defendant:
City of Winona, Officer James Burnett, Officer Orlando Bolden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boudreaux v. Breaux et al
as 6:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Boudreaux and Paul E Boudreaux
Defendant:
St. Martin PArish Sheriff Beckett Breaux, Claygus Herring, Carol Knott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Richard Lowery
Defendant:
Lillian Mills, Ethan Burris and Sheridan Titman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lowery v. Mills et al
as 1:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Richard Lowery
Defendant:
Lillian Mills, Ethan Burris and Sheridan Titman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
