Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-40656
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Griggs v. Graham
as 23-60169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Alan Griggs, Derenda Hancock and American Atheists, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee:
Chris Graham, Commissioner of Revenue, in his Official Capacity, Jonathan Tate Reeves, Governor of the State of Mississippi; in his Official Capacity, Lynn Fitch, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi; in her Official Capacity and others
Long v. Pace Realty et al
as 3:2022cv02100
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Long
Defendant:
Pace Realty and Wellington Place Apartment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burleson v. Pace et al
as 1:2021cv00857
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jedediah Burleson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Pace, Waco DPO-IV, Stephon Lightener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Pace v. Madison County et al
as 3:2020cv00487
Plaintiff:
Patricia Pace
Defendant:
Madison County Employees 1-10 and Madison County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pace v. Madison County et al
as 3:2019cv00867
Plaintiff:
Patricia Pace
Defendant:
Madison County and Unknown Madison County Employees One through Ten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Warren County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00879
Defendant:
Sheriff Martin Pace, John Does 1-15 and Warren County, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Denzell Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00836
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
