Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Sanford v. Kirst
as 24-30282
Plaintiff:
Jeffry L. Sanford, Individually, and on behalf of his minor son, Joseph Sanford
Defendant:
Joshua Kirst, H. Allen and City of Baton Rouge
Joseph v. Roszczvnialsk et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Joseph
Defendant:
Nicholas Roszczvnialsk, Sanford Ron and Kathryn E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brasher v. 15th Judicial District Court et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jaci Loveless Brasher
Defendant:
15th Judicial District Court, Susan Theall, David Blanchet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haywood v. Texas Realtor
as 23-11240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tianikwa Haywood and Paul-Douglas Celestine
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Realtor, Ceo or Owner, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C. Law Firm, Sanford & Kurland, Owner of Pennymac Loan Services, L.L.C. and others
Andrews v. Adams et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dessie Andrews
Defendant:
Alma S. Adams, Current and Former Members of Congress, Robert B Aderholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haywood et al v. Texas Realator et al
as 3:2022cv02174
Plaintiff:
Tianikwa Haywood and Paul-Douglas Celestine
Defendant:
Texas Realator, Mackie Wolf Zientz Man PC Law Firm, Sanford & Kurland and others
Petitioner:
DHI Title
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. Kirst et al
as 3:2021cv00347
Plaintiff:
Jeffry L Sanford
Defendant:
Joshua Kirst, Sgt. H. Allen, City of Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
