Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walker v. 20 Defendants et al
as 4:2022cv02653
Plaintiff:
Candace Lanell Walker and Candace Lanell Walker-Baldwin
Defendant:
20 Defendants, Arch Diocese, Cynthia Lanell Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
William Starrett, Jr. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al
as 18-10389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY STARRETT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, TEXAS MILITARY DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES ARMY CIVIL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS COMMAND and others
Holmes v. United States Army et al
as 6:2017cv00264
Defendant:
Captain FNU Dover, 1st Sgt. FNU Garcia and United States Army
Plaintiff:
Annette Denise Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hagedorn v. Obama et al
as 2:2016cv16919
Plaintiff:
Brian Albert Hagedorn
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Joseph F. Dunford, Eric Fanning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marcus Davis v. United States Army
as 15-30210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY
Corazon McDonald v. John McHugh
as 15-50078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORAZON MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Department of the United States Army
Broome v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2014cv02413
Plaintiff:
Terence Broome
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jefferson Parish, Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
