Cases 101 - 110 of 165,430
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 9:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dingle v. Port Arthur Police Department
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Marthur L Dingle
Defendant:
Port Arthur Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Texas Parole Board et al
as 6:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant:
Texas Parole Board, Temple, Texas Parole Office, Field Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Beaumont Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Hamilton
Defendant:
Beaumont Police Department, Jefferson County Sheriff Department and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Hamilton
Defendant:
State of Texas, Jefferson County Sheriff Department and Beaumont Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Paul Gary Allen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Meeks v. DeBouse
as 24-10431
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Meeks, III
Defendant:
Alvin DeBouse, FNU LNU, Chief Probation Officer, John Doe Task Force and others
Wiggins v. Lumpkin
as 24-10430
Petitioner:
Herbert Lavonne Wiggins
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Armour v. TX Board of Pardons
as 24-40347
Plaintiff:
Artis Armour
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, David Gutierriez, Paul Keil and others
Whitaker v. Boneberg et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jamison Whitaker
Defendant:
Kevin Boneberg, Hope Sumrow, Robert Daniel Freisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
