Cases 121 - 130 of 402
Dennis Freeman v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-40605
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS RAY FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Kappel v. Rupert et al
as 6:2016cv00239
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Kappel
Defendant:
John Rupert, Jeffrey Richardson, Brennan Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Rupert et al
as 6:2016cv00237
Plaintiff:
Johnny Fuentes
Defendant:
John Rupert, Jeffery Richardson, Brennan Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. USA
as 3:2016cv00196
Petitioner:
Derrick Freeman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Freeman v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00458
Petitioner:
Clyde James Freeman
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, State Classification In Huntsville (SCC) and Unit Classification Robertson Unit (UCC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, State Classification In Huntsville (SCC) and Unit Classification Robertson Unit (UCC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gar-ner v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 9:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Willi Free I Gar-ner
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation , David Driskell , Erika Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv01995
Petitioner:
Walter Keitric Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Foster v. Freeman
as 3:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Layman T. Foster
Defendant:
Unknown Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
