Cases 161 - 170 of 165,430
Vallejo Recio v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Daniel Vallejo Recio
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Propes Jr. v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 4:2024cv01778
Plaintiff:
Paul A Propes Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Fitzpatrick, Bryan Collier and Justice Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desouze v. Williams et al
as 4:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Captain Williams, Sargent Dixon, Pearl Legendre Taplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desouze v. Ben Taub Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv01800
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Ben Taub Hospital and Harris County Hospital District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mozingo v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
as 4:2024cv01801
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mozingo
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00256
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varnado v. Huffman et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Carlos Varnado
Defendant:
Brad Huffman, Ronald King, Unknown Canale and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
